Monday, March 10, 2008
Creationism vs. Evolution
Creationism v. Evolution
certain aspects of evolution i do agree with, such as Natural selection and adaptation. Once god created earth in 7 days i do believe that natural selection played a role in which species are able to survive. Adaptation also affects whether species survive in the world.
There are several examples that support evolutionism, but they either have gaps or just don't make sense. for example saying that everybody comes from a cell and "evolved" in to the very complex systems we are. This is hard to believe that a single cell could copy itself and change its self various times to get the numerous different cells in the human body. Creationism to me is the only thing that makes enough sense to believe.

My View
With the man's experiment proving that things can arise from nonliving things should not be the basis of all evolution.What is the probaibly that all the circumstance aligned perfectly together to form a living organism? Even in the bible god says we were made from dust and you can see when we die are body does what?.
There is so much evidence in my life that there is a god that i don't believe we orginated from chimps. Science is based on reasoning and since they couldn't reason god great power in creating the world in 7 days they proclaimed it impossible. God said human wisdom is foolish and can't comprehend his ways.
There are so many statements and experiments that are for evolution, but so many miracles and phenomonens in life that counter act that and show that there is a higher power in life.
With adaption i believe animals do evolve and change sameway people have done. God created man and woman, one of each, and look how much variations there are. Since God is big and vast so are his creations. People are made in the image of God and who said God is one image or face? There are to many if's with science that i can't stand for evolution. If people believe in withcraft, evil, satan, and ect. why isn't there a God.
Science is soly on human reasoning and I don't rely solely on human thinking since it can be corrupt(can be seen in our own way of thinking). There is a higher power and people believe in other things in what that higher power is, but there is one.Our bodies are to complex to have been made by just a passing of time.
(I will put a video later on)
Test for yourselves by opening both books the biology and the bible.
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Assignment -- Creation vs. Evolution Post -- Posted by Mrs. Berkeley
In this assignment you are to briefly define the two viewpoints. After providing brief introductory information, support one side of the evolution vs. creation debate. In your response be sure to provide explations supporting your conviction. After your initial post, you are to reply to two other posts on the blog. This assignment is not intended to create divisions amongst your peers, but instead is intended to motivate you to think critically and be able to set forth conflicting points of view. Please be respectful and reasonable in your posts. Worth 30 points. Due Wednesday, March 12, 2008.
Adapted from: http://www.millsaps.edu/religion/creationandevolution.shtml
evolution is fact
video that supports evolution
A chemist named Stanley Miller proves that life can be created from nothing. In his experiment called origin of life. This shows the creation of life from nothing.
Fossil evidence supports the origins of life on earth earlier than 3.5 billion years ago. The North Pole fossils from Australia are such that even more primitive cells must have existed earlier. From rocks of the Ishua Super Group in Greenland come possibly the earliest cells, 3.8 (?) billion years ago. J. William Schopf of UCLA recently discovered possibly photosynthetic prokaryotes from North America in 3.5 billion year old rocks, suggesting the existence of even older heterotrophic forms. The oldest known rocks on earth are 3.96 billion years old, and are from Arctic Canada. Thus, life appears to have begun soon after the cooling of the earth and formation of the atmosphere and oceans.
These ancient fossils occur in marine rocks, such as limestones and sandstones, that formed in ancient oceans. The organisms living today that are most similar to ancient life forms are the archaebacteria. This group is today restricted to marginal environments. Recent discoveries of bacteria at mid-ocean ridges add yet another possible origin for life: at these mid-ocean ridges where heat and molten rock rise to the earth's surface.
This is the proof of evolution.
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Creationism makes sense DAH !!!!!!!!
Evolutionists beleive that the universe, with all that it contains (space, time, matter and energy), exploded from nothing. This is opposite to the First Law of Thermodynamics. Where did space, time, matter and energy come from in the first place? So the ultimate question of origins of species remains unsolved for Evolutionists because the first law of thermodynamics state that energy can’t be created nor destroyed. So wait, if energy can’t be created then how did universe come into existence in the first place? Ahh perhaps creationism is the answer that God is almighty who has control of everything created the universe out of nothing. That’s 1 for creationism and 0 for evolutionism because evolutionism failed to explain how the origin of universe came into existence but creationism explained it clearly that god created it out of nothing. Second BIG problem with evolution is that how can Living things come from non living things. Ok, to back this argument up lets just take DNA for example, all living things have DNA or any living thing that is dead has DNA and non living things don’t have DNA. So using this FACT how can we say that we evolved from non living things when non living things never had DNA and living things need DNA. So that’s 2 for creationism and 0 for Evolution because living things evolving from non living things don’t make sense and there’s a huge proof against it that its impossible but a human brain can grasp an idea that a creator or GOD created living things out of nothing, I mean science disagrees with this but then again the theory that science comes up with is rubbish because it goes against human sense and scientific evidence. Furthermore, before we discuss the whole idea that did humans evolve from chimps or not, lets talk about how could new genetic information arise? Evolutionists believe that all life evolved from a single cell, so for that to take place a lot of new genetic info would have to be added to the cell, so where would all those genes come from? So where did all these circulatory system, immune system, urinary system, intestines and so on systems come from when they were not found in the original ancestral species. See it just doesn’t make sense. That’s 3 for creationism and 0 for evolution because creationism explains it that’s Gods almighty and he has total power so he created Humans or other living species as themselves out of his power. So far evolution doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t explain origin of life and living things evolving from non living things is just absurd. But creationism gives the human mind something to grasp on that logic can explain that the universe is the creation and it was created by the creator or God. Furthermore The theory of evolution teaches that simple life forms evolved into more complex life forms such as fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. There is no natural law known that could allow this to happen. The best that evolutionists can come up with to try to explain how this might have happened is to propose that it happened by mutations and natural selection. But mutations and natural selection do not show gain in information, just rearrangement or loss of what is already there. These are just some of the reasons why creationism makes sense and evolution seems absurd. Stay tuned for the next part of the issue to get enlightened because on the next issue I answer the question of the century that are we descendants of chimps?
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Comment on Philip's Blog
comment on philip's blog
comment on Philipos Blog
i would like to comment on Philip's blog about how cross over takes places. he was right about how it takes places, but could have gone more in depth about it.
Crossing over takes places in prophase 1 of meiosis 1. Chromosomal crossover is the process by which two homologous chromosomes exchange portions of DNA. Crossover usually occurs when portions of homologous chromosomes brake off and rejoin with other chromosomes. This is the exchange of genes, which is called genetic recombination.
Friday, December 14, 2007
comment on Philipos Blog
comment on CHAPTER 13
philip i liked the your post about meiosis and mitosis and the stages they go through. meiosis and mitsosis has much more then these process. you should've mentioned somethign about crossoverin detail for example it's a exchange of genetic material between homologues that occurs in prohase1 of meiosis 1. And also you should've talk msomethign about the three types of life cycle which are animal, fungi and plant. and their functions are: plant: alternation of generation, diploid stage is called sporophyte in which spores produce plant and haploid stage is gametophyte in which gametes produce plants divide mitotically. You should've mentioned some information about Asexual and sexual reproduction. I think that's about it philip
comment on Philips Blog
Comment on Philips post
Dorathy
Thursday, December 13, 2007
comment on Roxxaine blog
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Part II Meiosis

Part 1 of Meiosis
Friday, October 26, 2007
Thursday, October 25, 2007
10.25 chapter 9 review
Today we reviewed chapter 9, which was on cellular respiration.
So here are some quick notes for review.
Oxidation: lose electrons, release energy, exergonic.
Reduction: gain electrons, stores energy, endergonic.
The three stages of cellular respiration: glycolysis, citric acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation.
~38 ATPs / 1 glucose
Two types of fermentation: alcohol and lactic acid.
To remember, just remind yourself that lactic acid fermentation is what we experienced when we did that painful bending exercise and alcohol fermentation is what we’ll be doing with the root beer experiment.
“I really don’t like your boyfriend, Glycolysis. He’s not producing enough ATP.”
10.24 Chapter 8 Review
So yesterday we reviewed chapter 8, which was an introduction to metabolism. Here are some quick notes you should remember.
-Metabolism includes all of the chemical reactions in an organism.
-Catabolic pathways breaks down more complex molecules to simpler ones.
-Anabolic pathways makes complex molecules from simpler ones.
----To remember anabolic pathways, I thinking of anabolic steroids helps me. They are steroids that build up the body’s muscle mass. Don’t ask me why I know that.
-The first law of thermodynamics states that energy can be transferred and transformed but cant be created nor destroyed.
-The second law of thermodynamics explains that energy transfer or transformation increases the entropy, disorder, of the universe.
-Exergonic reactions proceeds with a net release of free energy
-Endergonic reactions absorbs free energy from its surroundings.
-Energy can be kenetic or potential.
-Kenetic: energy of motion. Ex: light and heat
-Potential: energy of position. Ex: arrangement or location.
-If it ends in –ase its an enzyme.
-Enzymes have three different inhibitors: competitive, noncompetitive and feedback.
These images may be helpful in better understanding the different inhibitors.
http://classes.midlandstech.com/carterp/Courses/bio225/chap05/05-07_EnzymeInhibit_1.jpg
http://classes.midlandstech.com/carterp/Courses/bio225/chap05/05-08_Feedback_1.jpg
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
AP Biology Lab 2: Enzyme catalysis
Hey class, this is the summary of todays lab and i hope you will understand the lab better after reading this blog entry.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Cellular Respiration Video
Mrs. Berkley
Monday, October 22, 2007
Class 10/22/07
first this is a video on cellular respiration done by kids in a AP Bio class in Vermont i think...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=FFBr3ANCkb4
glycolysis not only breaks down glucose but can accept a wide range of molecules such as polysaccharides and other forms of 6C sugars(galactose and fructose). The diffrent molecules would then be changed and broken down into glucose, then the process is continued.
main facts about glycolysis
it breaks 6c glucose into 2 3C pyruvates
forms net of 2 atps
and 2 NADH
krebs cycle yields
1 atp
3NADH
and 1 FADH2
*remember numbers produce in krebs cycle is multiplied by 2 because there are TWO pyruvates each going through the cycle.
one glucose can produce 36-38 ATPs


